A follow-on to my previous post... when I used the
Post# of 3400
![](/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
For the "Pearlman theory" to hold you would need the preferred shareholder issue to be incorrectly described in the notification. The odds of that are low - given the scrutiny of documents. So in the end, my theory is likely as I described before... just a side-show to the main event.
JMO - do your DD.
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)